Quality framework for emergency departments
P28 V5
Document review
Timeframe for review: Every three years, or earlier if required.
Document authorisation: Council of Advocacy, Practice and Partnerships
Document implementation: Standards and Endorsement Committee
Document maintenance: Department of Policy, Research and Partnerships
Revision history
Version |
Date |
Pages revised / Brief Explanation of Revision |
V1 |
Jul 2007 |
Approved by Council |
V2 |
Mar 2012 |
Approved by Council |
V3 |
Jul 2016 |
Approved by Council
|
V4 |
Sep 2019 |
New template adopted; content reviewed. |
V5 |
May 2022 |
Updated to reflect new quality standards.
|
Copyright
- Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. All rights reserved.
1. Purpose and Scope
This document outlines the importance of establishing and maintaining a quality framework in emergency departments (EDs) and articulates the responsibility of the College and its members in that undertaking.
This policy applies to EDs and hospital-based emergency care services in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.1
2. Position
ACEM believes that a quality culture is fundamental to the provision of the highest standard of care in EDs in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The role of ACEM in promoting a quality culture in emergency medicine is to provide leadership and to develop quality standards that are applicable to the practice of emergency medicine at all levels.
3. ACEM Quality Standards
ACEM has developed Quality Standards for Emergency Departments and other Hospital-Based Emergency Care Services (the ‘Quality Standards’). The Quality Standards provide guidance and set expectations for the provision of equitable, safe, and high-quality emergency care in EDs and other hospital-based emergency care services in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The Quality Standards cover five domains which represent the core priorities of the ED:
- Clinical care patient pathway
- Administration
- Professionalism
- Education and training
- Research
Within each domain, there is a hierarchical structure which includes standards, objectives, and criteria. ACEM has developed a Quality Standards Toolkit (Toolkit) to use in conjunction with the Quality Standards. The Toolkit assists users in navigating the Quality Standards.
4. Cultural Safety
The Quality Standards include an overarching principle of Cultural Safety to acknowledge the disparities in health outcomes that occur across communities in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand and all emergency health services must be committed to improving health equity across both countries. ACEM supports the definition of cultural safety provided by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA)1:
Cultural safety is determined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, families, and communities. Culturally safe practice is the ongoing critical reflection of health practitioner knowledge, skills, attitudes, practising behaviours and power differentials in delivering safe, accessible, and responsive healthcare free of racism.
5. Recommendations
ACEM recommends that all:
a. EDs have a designated quality team with defined roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines. This team should include medical and nursing staff and may also incorporate clerical staff, allied health professionals and consumer representatives.
b. Health services and hospitals make the ACEM Quality Standards and Toolkit accessible to all ED staff.
c. EDs have a documented quality framework.
6. Related ACEM Resources
- ACEM (2022). Quality Standards for Australian Emergency Departments and other Hospital-Based Emergency Care Services. Melbourne: ACEM.
- ACEM (2022). Quality Standards for Emergency Departments and Hospital-Based Emergency Care Services Toolkit. Melbourne: ACEM.
- ACEM (2020). P395 Policy on Internet Access in the Emergency Department. Melbourne: ACEM.
7. References
- Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. The National Scheme’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health and Cultural Safety Strategy 2020-2025. Melbourne: AHPRA; 2020.